Are Star Tattoos On A Man Gay

Question # 28: fatal oblivion of the apostles!

With the opening of the heathen to Christianity, an opening which took place mainly thanks to Paul who proclaimed apostle dens Gentiles (non Jews) after an alleged vision on his way to Damascus, a lively debate broke out between the members of the young Christian community: The pagans did they observe the Law of Moses or not?

It was during the Council of Jerusalem, which is the first Christian council, took place this debate. This fact is reported in Chapter 15 of the Book of Acts:

15.1

Some men came down from Judaea taught the brethren, saying: If you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you can not be saved.

15.2

Paul and Barnabas had with them a lively debate and discussion, and the brothers decided that Paul and Barnabas and some of them, go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question.

15.3

After being accompanied by the Church, they continued their journey through Phoenicia and Samaria, declaring the conversion of pagans, and they caused great joy to all the brothers.

15.4

arrived in Jerusalem, they were received by the Church, the apostles and elders , and they reported everything God had done with them.

15.5

While some of the Pharisees, who believed rose up, saying he had to circumcise them, and require compliance with the law of Moses.

15.6

The apostles and elders met to consider this matter.

15.7

Much discussion has committed itself , Peter got up and said: Brethren, you know that long ago God made choice among you, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the Gospel and believe.

15.8

And God knows the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Spirit as to us;

15.9

it made no difference between us and them, purified their hearts by faith.

15.10

Now therefore why tempt ye God, putting on the necks of the disciples a yoke which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?

15.11

But by the grace of the Lord Jesus that we believe to be saved in the same way they do.

15.12

whole assembly kept silence, and they listened to Barnabas and Paul, who told all the miracles and wonders God had done through them among the Gentiles.

15.13

When they had finished speaking, Jacques spoke up and said: "Brethren, listen to me!

...

15.19

is why I believe we do not creates difficulties for those pagans who converted to God

15.20

but that they write s' abstain from pollutions of idols, from fornication, from things strangled and blood.

15.21

Because, for many generations, Moses in every city them that preach him, being read every Sabbath in synagogues.

15.22

Then it seemed good to the apostles and elders, and the whole Church, choose among them and send them to Antioch, with Paul and Barsabbas, Jude called Barnabas and Silas, men among the brethren.

15.23

They charged them a letter: The apostles, elders, and brothers, brothers of the Gentiles, who are in Antioch, Syria, and Cilicia, hello!

15.24

Having learned that some men went out from us, and that we had given no orders have troubled you with words, unsettling your souls,

15.25

we decided to By the way, after we all together, to choose delegates and send them to you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul,

15.26

these men who risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.

15.27

We have therefore sent Judas and Silas, who will announce their mouth the same things.

15.28

For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and we do require you to load other than what is necessary,

15.29

namely, to abstain from meat sacrificed to idols, blood, strangled, and fornication, things against which you will find much to keep you alert. Goodbye.

15.30

So they, having taken leave of the church, went to Antioch, where they delivered the letter to the assembled multitude.

We thus see that this council has been organizing to end the controversy between Christians and non Christians whether Jews should or should not observe the Law of Moses.
We see in this passage that there were two opposing sides: one side the Christian Pharisees who insisted that the Act should be applied by the pagans as well as Jews , and on the other side other Christians close to Paul who believed that Gentile converts should not be under the Act.

The apostles decided to give the party because of Paul but by imposing certain COMMAND converted pagans, namely: "abstain from pollutions of idols, from fornication, from things strangled and blood."

The problem is that the apostles have unfortunately forgotten an important recommendation of Christ. Indeed Jesus had already told them of his ministry at:

23.1

Then Jesus Speaking to the crowd and his disciples, said:

23.2

Scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses' seat.

23.3

So be and observe whatever they tell you but do not ye after their works. As they say, and do not. (Matthew)

So Jesus had to testify the validity of the doctrine of the Pharisees who, using his own words, sat in the chair of Moses . They had a very good knowledge of the Act, only they were not applying themselves their own teaching, as Jesus says: "As they say, and do not do."

The apostles instead of following the recommendations of Jesus (Math23: 3) and rule in favor of the Pharisees in the Christian Council of Jerusalem and all follow what they say, inevitably have forgotten this and have opted for the 'Relief Act to Gentiles.

This oversight has led to the fatal error of millions of Christians and that until today!



Ibn Karim.

Sony Watch Movies From Usb

Question # 27: Jeremiah and Zechariah?

The Evangelist Matthew quotes several passages from the Old Testament that refer to him as Jesus. Matthew tells us something very famous in the history of Jesus, or that Judas the traitor with remorse decides to make 30 pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, they refuse, then Judas threw the 30 pieces and suicide. The chief priests bought the field with that money. This passage is found in Matthew 27:3-10 :



27.3

Then Judas, which had betrayed him, seeing he was condemned, repented, and brought back the thirty pieces of money the chief priests and elders,
27.4

saying I sin, betrayed the innocent blood. They answered: What do we care? This is watching you.
27.5

Judas threw the silver coins in the temple, he departed and went and hanged himself.
27.6

The chief priests picked up and said, "It is not permissible to put into the treasury, since it is blood money.
27.7

And, after deliberation, they bought with them the field potter, to bury strangers.
27.8

Wherefore that field was called Field of Blood to this day.
27.9

Then was fulfilled what was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet : They took the thirty pieces of silver, its value has been estimated, we estimated from the children of Israel;
27.10

and he gave them for the potter's field, as the Lord had commanded me.




Matthew us says here that this event was prophesied by the prophet Jeremiah. The problem here is that we have to look good this prophecy in the Book of Jeremiah, it can not be found.
In reality this is not the prophet Jeremiah who said this but the prophet Zechariah:


11.13

The Lord said: Cast it to the potter, the price at which they magnificent me felt! And I took the thirty shekels of silver and threw them into the house of the LORD to the potter. (Zechariah)




Evangelist Matthew was so wrong prophet, instead of attributing the prophecy in Zechariah who is the real author, he falsely attributed to Jeremiah, who did not vote!

Christian theologians have acknowledged this mistake:


- Calvin

"I confess I do not know how the name of Jeremiah has met here, and do not torment me hard. Certainly the thing shows itself it was misused by putting the name of Jeremiah for Zechariah, because in Jeremiah, we do not find this, or anything that Approach Calvin. (cited Annotated Bible on Matthew 27:9)


- Bible Neuchatel:

" The following quotation is not found in Jeremiah, but in Zechariah 11.12,13. Some

tiny have corrected this mistake by entering the name of Zacharias, and others are simply the prophet, but the name of Jeremiah is undoubtedly genuine. To overcome this difficulty, we resorted to various assumptions worthless.

must see inadvertence, to which a passage from Jeremiah (Jeremiah 2.18) could easily give rise. "

http://epelorient.free.fr/nta/nta.html


This mistake leads us to ask ourselves seriously on the Holy Spirit said to have inspired the evangelists. The Holy Spirit is God for Christians can inspire the error?
And if Matthew was mistaken about how this passage can we be assured that it has not done elsewhere? How to trust?






Ibn Karim.

Pokemon Emerald Wild Pokemon Modifier

around the exhibition "Angola is able to"

Dapper Museum

November 10, 2010 to July 10, 2011

Editor C. Falgayrettes-LEVEAU
With the scientific collaboration of B. Wastiau

exposure are exceptionally brilliant when combined parts scattered around the world.
Chokwe, Kongo, Lwena, Lwimbi, Mwila Ovimbundu ... gave birth to court arts as prestigious artistic practices developed, linked to the worship of ancestors
The cultural richness and refinement sculptural artifacts jumps to his eyes but our interest in knowing the relationship between the object itself and the society that produced it.

View Press Museum Dapper

Click on photos to enlarge

Chibinda Ilunga mythical hero

honored As a culture hero,
important Chokwe chiefs considered themselves his descendants.

Masks

Masks Chokwe
for rites and ceremonies of PWO,
female masks that embodies a model of female role
but are worn by dancers man

The Minkissi Kongo
Receptacles powers for good or ill
Bilongo or which by their magical charge allows the Nanga
to cure his patients

women

seats

pipes and snuff boxes

combs

pottery

Himbas

From November 10 to July 10 Musée Dapper 2011

33 bis, rue Paul Valéry - 75116 Tel
. 01 45 00 91 75
www.dapper.com.fr

Museums that have contributed to this exhibiton

enable links

National Museum of Ethnology in Lisbon

ethnographic museum Geographical Society of Lisbon

Musee de Tervuren

MEG

On France Culture

History of Queen Ginga by Michel Chandeigne on France Culture: A queen of the gods and

Queen Ginga and Jaga, mercenary warriors and fearsome

Queen Ginga or Nzingha (1582-1663) was a true warrior, a leader of men. Known

as a visionary political leader, Ginga was completely devoted to the resistance movement. The elders say she possessed masculine hardness and feminine charm. He died 17 December 1663 opened the doors to the massive trade in slaves by the Portuguese. Ginga, there is a street in Luanda that bears his name and brand of coffee. The period of slavery remains a museum: the museum of slaves, located 32 km from Luanda to Benfica. Built on the edge of a hill, surrounded by water, the museum looks after the collective memory.

is from here that ships loaded with slaves to the Americas

Low Glycemic Breakfast Cereal

Trichet, stupidity, left

You do not agree with Jean-Claude Trichet? Yet he is right.

He said that any wage increase " would be the last folly to " in the current context. Countries " who have mastered their costs are very successful in reducing unemployment , "he added, referring to Germany.

His reasoning is correct, since it does not redistribute wealth . Increasing wages would be the point of view a stupidity that does not adhere either Medef neither the government: either, social justice, they do not.

Trichet certainties: he said that increasing wages, c is to increase inflation. But it's his job fight against inflation, for the cause he defends. It is paid for it. Without an increase in salary, hopefully. Him, inflation in its way. Not the accumulation of wealth in the hands of a few .

a time when oil prices are surging ahead (yesterday the price of a barrel was worth U.S. $ 105, its highest level since September 2008), and because of this Cheret, the price of "basic", that of food, will increase. Will therefore pose the problem of purchasing power of employees. Of those who go to work by car, the cost of heating, the electricity, etc.. To cope, employees will want their salaries be increased.

Jean-Claude Trichet knows. Its purpose is to think of something else, not to dwell on the immediate, unbearable for the masses. He said interest in unemployment, and his method is clear: the employee still in office to pay the cost of hiring! Beyond its obsession with inflation, it is the camp of those who say do not raise wages is to reduce unemployment, while others argue that employees consume better paid more, and therefore that companies with a revival of productivity, extra work, hire.

should not take Jean-Claude Trichet for what it is not: his sentence is awkward. That he will not change this fact well established for twenty years: wages rise less rapidly than productivity at work, one point per year, which is dedicated to profits, which are not to reinvest the field's productive countries but increase shareholder dividends. Last twenty years, the stock companies CAC40 increases, shareholder dividends flourish.

It was inevitable that this money comes from somewhere. It comes from the setting aside of the social question . Under the damper stagnant wages and global demand. Climbing unemployment and precariousness.

Look how the right does more boost the minimum wage . She even made a bet diabolical grant "relief" businesses who take advantage of exemptions, must stay below a certain level of pay ... what drives them not to increase wages! When you consider the reduction of social protection.

Then, in the context of extending the sphere of profits, reduced social protection, lessening the capacity of state intervention and destruction public services, that will left to reduce unemployment and precariousness, to increase wages?

In, other words, it does tackle will redefine the role of work in our society, and for this to blow the locks that are tight in alienating the last parliament and not put up with some paint strokes ?

+ +

(illustration title: Ceramic Saverio Lucariello

• increase wages
• stupidity
• Jean-Claude Trichet

See also my site http: / / raphaeljornet.free.fr /

Wet Feeling Down There

RPG cannibal

Their game of ping-pong table is set: Nicolas launching a reform idea, and Laurence counterpoint rectifies shooting. Horror cinema.

He suggested a consultation on the creation of a fifth branch of social security and its funding? She said no, she wants a mandatory private insurance to fund the addiction.

He says he wants "to bonus system - penalties for businesses that hire or not young people in learning? She uttered a cry of outrage, that No! this is not " executive, associate it to the legislature" to interfere in the matter, he did not become " the super-HRD Business .

is simple: she wants " zérocharges " for any employment in the SOHO (small businesses), it does not unions in the TPE,

social VAT? yes, no, maybe, must see, she said in substance. But she said that this debate " refers to a question that we, MEDEF, want to see the heart of the presidential election : financing of social protection .

Laurence prepares for elections in 2012 for his friend already President.

Asserting the future candidate, cleared, it is just to make sure that " nothing " did please at Marine Le Pen. Which is funny because the two ladies prônen tune "drop charges" of companies and chattering about "training" in the same way! But Laurence Parisot know at the time of the UMP seeks to distinguish himself, to stand against him, that the FN will graze the grass at Sarkozy's first round.

Here and elsewhere, the presidential campaign has begun. The suggestion box of the candidate Sarkozy, its roadmap obligation, begins with " on Map Table 2011: a fair competitive "Laurence Parisot presented February 8, 2011, a publication giving a ' photograph of the French economy " guide " further reform France and direct our collective choice to the requirement for global competitiveness . Besides, she does not hide it: it is " a kickoff to our contribution debate for the presidential election. . Come year-end booklet specific claims of MEDEF. As in 2007.

the program, the war against the taxes which would represent in France26, 4% of value added in 2008, against 13% in Germany. " It's as if companies had to work in France until mid-April to pay their payroll taxes and ," reads the text in . In Germany, it should work as until mid-February .

Having the ear of the President, and knowing them in murders economic one day she will see businesses thrive without charge from 1 st January, without any inconvenience than having to pay their employees, who paid handsomely, will do without the state, provision of social solidarity and employment law. A social murder, no, Laurence?

Laurence Parisot has the policy that itches and very hungry.

See also my site http://raphaeljornet.free.fr/